It's hardly surprising that will all the media hyperbole that the latest Times poll shows that majority of the public think that most MPs are on the fiddle. The press correctly has been pointing out the mess of London MPs in commutable distance of Westminster. Those claiming second homes allowances which equate to more than the taxi fares that would be able to get them home every night is a mockery. But the headline figures of total expenses has failed to recognise staffing and office costs, required travel and the like. Even our own Irfan Ahmed jumped on the bandwagon without truly understanding just how expensive it is for the far flung Lib Dem MPs to carry out work in Westminster and their constituencies every week. Thankfully Mark Valladares called him on it in a sadly as yet unanswered or acknowledged challenge.
What is needed is clearly a transparency in what our MPs claim on their expenses. That way the public can know that the bulk of what is spent is actually required for them to carry out their
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b435e/b435ef51fb494f44f3a8d579d04ffd16afeec18a" alt="Check Spelling"
The bulk of our MPs I'm fairly certain do not abuse the system, there are even a great many who are wary of even seeming to break the spirit of the system. But a bulk of what are being branded as expenses are not perks for the individuals in question but allowances to enable to carry out the work that those who elected them expect to be carried out. It's time for the leaders of all parties to listen to the public and make it clearer, more accessible and understandable just what is going on.
As for Mr Woodward is that's life for you now I'll be waiting for the You Tube clip of a dog saying "sleazy Woodward" instead of mere sausages.
*Hillsborough Castle.
No comments:
Post a Comment