tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14418636.post113857189222150599..comments2023-11-03T08:45:55.121+00:00Comments on Stephen's Liberal Journal: Disgusted of Scotland IIStephen Glennhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03027718551675624433noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14418636.post-1138580116095278912006-01-30T00:15:00.000+00:002006-01-30T00:15:00.000+00:00I've already written to the paper seeking a writte...I've already written to the paper seeking a written apology. I think you may be right on the copyrighting issue however we then get into the grey area of intellectual property and the fact that my intellectual property rights on that blog entry have been distorted in a form that a large number of the 7100 people who voted for me in May might misconstrue as not being happy about Simon when the opposite is indeed the case. Possibly portraying me as an illiberal Liberal Democrat.Stephen Glennhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03027718551675624433noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14418636.post-1138578685883866372006-01-29T23:51:00.000+00:002006-01-29T23:51:00.000+00:00You should try and get them to publish an apology,...You should try and get them to publish an apology, and if they won't then take it to the Press Complaints Commission?<BR/><BR/>By talking about a Five Live phone in and then saying 'Stephen Glenn added,' the paper gives the very misleading impression that you were taking part in the Five Live phone-in and, by using 'added,' that you were agreeing with the guy who felt badly let down. (Your quote itself doesn't actually sound as if you've changed your opinion - it's the misleading context in which it's been put, I think).<BR/><BR/>Re. quoting from copyrighted material, though - isn't it OK (legally) as long as it's brief?<BR/><BR/>BTW, the question of how the Sun got information on chatline usage without breaking the Data Protection Act is an interesting one...Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com